3 Replies to “HB 1008 (2025)”

1. The author argued that doctors following the law shouldn’t worry about the bill, despite OB/GYN workforce concerns over strict bans. Minority Leader Munson and Rep. Hefner, both women, questioned whether their doctors would stay in Oklahoma or hesitate in emergencies, also citing long wait times and worsening access.

   When asked why HB 1008 adds a new crime targeting doctors if abortion is already banned, the author reiterated that compliant doctors shouldn’t worry. A note, the survey showing fear amongst Oklahoma OB/GYNs was collected in 2023 and Oklahoma has continued to propose and adopt punitive measures since.

   He claimed the lack of prosecutions proves doctors are compliant and not unfairly targeted but failed to address how fear of prosecution has altered medical practice, potentially harming patients.

2. The author claimed HB 1008 would help providers by clarifying when abortion is allowed. However, the bill instead changes the standard based on a provider’s “judgment” and requires weighing the lives of the mother and fetus equally, likely adding confusion.

   He stated that “80-90% of OB/GYNs don’t perform abortions” without citing a source, likely referencing a 2014 Guttmacher study that does not account for the post-Dobbs impact of strict regulations and criminalization fears. Meanwhile, during debate, a 2023 survey noted that 75% of OB/GYNs in Oklahoma have left or plan to leave, and nationwide, OB/GYNs and residents are increasingly unwilling to work in states with strict bans (ACOG, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Oklahoman).

3. Sets a new standard for abortions to preserve the life of the mother. Requires the life of the mother and baby be prioritized, and can only be administered if the mother is on the verge of death.

Comments are closed.